The head tax.
The dockage.
The water fees.
Other miscellaneous hook up fees.
And the parking fees.
This is what killed the
business. Not the EPA regulations, as Carnival spokesman Vance Gullickson
implied.
Gulliksen said Carnival is
moving the Glory out of Norfolk to Miami because new rules require cruise lines to reduce the amount of
sulfur that their fuel burns, he said.
Bunkum.
"Itinerary operating
costs including fuel costs are a factor in our deployment decisions. The 2015
North America Emission Control Area requirements would significantly impact our
fuel costs for operating cruises from Norfolk
and many other ports around North America."
A red herring.
In other words, it’s not
precisely about ship emissions. It’s about the cost of steaming two hours into
and out of Norfolk.
EPA regulations are the same everywhere.
The real reason: operating
costs, including fuel costs.
It takes a ship two hours
to steam from a point in the Chesapeake Bay to Norfolk. To get here, every ship must hire a
pilot to guide the ship into port, and the Virginia Pilot Association’s
piloting rates are based on a formula.
Carnival challenged the
Association’s formula several years ago, complaining that their fees were too
high and threatened to send their ships to other ports.
The pilot’s balked at the
suggestion, defending its right to charge the expensive fees because that’s how
they always charged shipping lines.
Carnival took the Association
to court and won. The law firm of +Vandeventer Black LP represented the
Association.
Which means.
That Norfolk is too expensive a call for the amount of passengers Carnival can attract here for their cruises to break even and to make a profit.
That Norfolk is too expensive a call for the amount of passengers Carnival can attract here for their cruises to break even and to make a profit.
Don’t listen to city staff
for explanations. They are paid to be optimistic and to protect the city’s
positive and spotless image.
So if you want the real scoop, contact these people.
So if you want the real scoop, contact these people.
Call +Tom Host, vice president of +T. Parker Host Inc., the shipping agent
that pushed to have a cruise terminal in the first place. 627-8761
Host represents Carnival
and some of the other shipping lines that once docked in Norfolk.
Call Alan +Boring at +Norfolk’s Development
Department. 664-4338. Boring can tell you the history of the original study
that supported a cruise terminal.
Call +George Brown at +Ports
America, formerly CP&O, a stevedoring company, which unloaded and loaded the luggage to and from the ships. 640.2580
But give Norfolk Vice
Mayor +Anthony Burfoot credit. At least he spoke. And he was dead on
target.
Most politicians are quick to sound off with serendipitous soundbites when the going's good. But you can't find them when their pet project dissolves into a dismal failure.
Butfoot said the $37.1 million +Half Moon Cruise and Celebration Center was sold to the public as a cruise terminal. Not as a “celebration” center.He is right. It was, to much fanfare.
Most politicians are quick to sound off with serendipitous soundbites when the going's good. But you can't find them when their pet project dissolves into a dismal failure.
Butfoot said the $37.1 million +Half Moon Cruise and Celebration Center was sold to the public as a cruise terminal. Not as a “celebration” center.He is right. It was, to much fanfare.
But his suggestion that
the region should promote and market the cruise terminal will never fly.
That’s like asking Norfolk to underwrite the
$18 million corporate welfare check for +Bruce Thompson for the renovation of
the Cavalier Hotel.
How can we expect to
cooperate about the cruise terminal when we can’t even cooperate about
transportation?
Good luck Mr. Burfoot. You
will need it.
Suggestion: Make the +Norfolk
Community Services Board pay the debt service on the bonds issued to
finance the cruise terminal from their budget. After all, they seem to have
enough money to pay workers not to work.
Published by Indie News Network LLC
Published by Indie News Network LLC
No comments:
Post a Comment