Sunday, August 4, 2013

Congress stumped by definition of a journalist

Who wouldn’t be? Most people face the same dilemma. Even reporters argue about whether someone is a reporter or a writer. 

An editor once said I would rather have one good reporter instead of five outstanding writers. Hemingway was a crappy journalist. But he was a writer with real style. One of the best. 

Crowe as a journalist in the film State of Siege
But this is Congress, the great American and global legislative body that literally makes decisions that run the world.

But even Congress, (technically, the Senate Judiciary Committee) before they departed for their summer recess, couldn’t decide on the definition of a journalist.

The new legislation, presented by Sens. Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham, would protect the media from revealing information and sources during news gathering and require courts to 'apply a balancing test before compelling disclosure' from journalists, among other measures, according to a Politico article.

What a rush
Language in the bill defining a journalist as someone who has the “primary intent to investigate events and procure material” has Senators gasping and grasping.

Even an elite group of reporters – or a group that considers itself elite because they cover Congress and the White House – the Standing Committee of Correspondents gave their five cents, which is about all it worth. (and that doesn’t include inflation).
This group of professionals, which issues congressional press passes, requires that reporters be full time and paid in order to receive passes.
This group is headed by Big Media – McClatchy, Wall Street Journal, Congressional Quarterly, Bloomberg News.

Of course, they want to protect their turf from any insane, radical and sarcastic blogger, wanna be reporter/journalist and First Amendment fighter.
They, of course, want to be the messengers; especially in today’s environment, they also want to be the expert.

California liberal Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who suggested that the definition apply only to journalists who make salaries, out of fear that WikiLeaks might come under the law's protection. (Feinstein’s district includes the San Francisco Chronicle.)
Sen. Charles Schumer also sided against WikiLeaks, but said there should be greater scope for bloggers, the article said.

"The world has changed…But there are people who write and do real journalism, in different ways than we’re used to. They should not be excluded from this bill."

The Politico article referred to a link to the full report by McClatchy.
Right on Chuck.

Bloggers break stories for which they are not given credit.
Granby Theater’s last performance, The Daily Newswanger, Friday, July 26, 2013
Owner: “No foreclosure” for Granby Theater, Inside Business, Monday, July 29, 2013
Owner: the curtain isn’t falling on Granby Theater, Virginian-Pilot, Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Bloggers break stories for which they are given credit.
Port reorganization creates storm at VIT
The resignations, which happened at a Virginia International Terminals board meeting earlier this week, were first reported by local blogger Phil Newswanger.
Daily Press, May 30, 2013

Journalists are…
Cynical
Skeptical
Curious, nosey and intrusive
Sometimes self-effacing
Sometimes elitist
Most often a pain in the ass
Marries someone who makes more money
Doesn’t always make money
Doesn’t always get a regular paycheck
Loved, hated, then loved, then hated
Sued for no reason
Sued for a good reason
Some like the camera while others shun the spotlight and lurk in primal darkness
But, all things considered, it’s a good days work

Jefferson hated the press. But he knew it was vital for a democracy to survive. Ben Franklin, a printer and our first newspaper magnate, agreed.

So Congress should channel their collective inner Jefferson and Franklin.

Published by Indie News Network LLC




Comment

Comment Box is loading comments...