No!
Readers say no to the city subsidizing a hotel for Bruce
Thompson, the Virginia Beach hotel magnate, in downtown Norfolk.
The poll is unscientific. But the results are unanimous.
Nine respondents opposed spending city money for a
proposed hotel and conference center at the The Plot spot.
Should the city offer the same deal to Thompson as it
offered to previous developers, the city would pay for the convention center,
estimated at $50 million, and $16 million for a parking garage. (The costs
might have gone up, based on inflation, but let’s assume they are somewhere in
the ballpark.)
The city might even throw in $7.5 million in tax rebates to
sweeten the pot, as it did in previous deals, and a $750,000 grant for an
upscale restaurant.
Don’t forget, either, the $16 million Norfolk has spent
buying and demolishing historic buildings, architectural, engineering and
appraisal fees, to prepare the plot for a hotel, conference center and parking
garage.
Consider also that Thompson won’t assume most of the risk.
The city will. He can pull out at any time.
But can the city? How will the city recoup the $16 million
it spent already based on promises from developers?
Poverty

But Fraim admits that the city’s poverty rate is too high.
“A large segment of our workforce lives outside of
Norfolk,” Fraim said. “We must do more to connect Norfolk residents with
Norfolk jobs.”
Fraim said that later this month, City Council will
appoint a task force to examine the nature of poverty in the city and recommend
actions that will result in increased educational attainment, job training and employment
among individuals and families living in poverty.
The task force will spend a year examining poverty in the
city.
The city released a report on poverty December 11 under Council Concenrs and Interests of last year.
It was compiled by the Office of Budget and
Grants Management based on statistics from the Census Bureau’s American
Community Survey.
Simply put, Norfolk has a poverty problem.
Statistics show that 37,759 individuals, or 16.4 percent of
Norfolk’s population, are classified as poverty stricken.
Norfolk’s family poverty rate increased from 11.8 percent of
the population in 2010 to 14.6 percent of the city’s population in 2011, the
report said.
Norfolk has the second highest poverty rate in the region,
second only to Portsmouth, the report said.
Can a task force reduce the unemployment rate and bring jobs
to the city?
Rich City, Poor
Families
Following the mayor’s speech, the city issued a press
release saying it will buy the Traveler’s Inn motel and property located at 800
East Ocean View Boulevard for $800,000.
Appreciate the irony in that the
city, rife with poverty, is spending $800,000 to “further improve the quality of
life in the Ocean View community.”
This isn’t the only time the city has bought property (or
given it away for less than its value) “to improve the “quality of life.”
In the industrial section of the Berkley neighborhood sits a
vacant industrial property, which the city bought for $3.5 million.
It was intended, in the eyes of a former city council
member, to be an aquatic center, condos and who knows what else.
City Council approved the purchase. Yet nothing has been
done with it.
I am 50 years old and today's "poor" live in the same neighborhood I grew up in, with 2 cars, airconditioning (which I didn't have), color cable TV (which I didn't have), computers and wireles internet (which didn't exist) and a ton of government aid. For the first time in the history of the world, the number one health concern of a nation's poor is obesity. I took a perfect good bike to a thrift shop to donate. They wouldn't take it. "Can't give them away". While poor is not deisrable, the social welfare system kills initiative and makes it very tollerable. Why achieve?
ReplyDeleteChill out dude. I'm sure they'd love to switch places with you. No matter how much "stuff" they have, nothing can replace the dignity that comes with working and providing for a family.
ReplyDeletePoint is, they don't need to switch places with the person who wrote the first comments. They have enough "stuff" and there are significant incentives to remain just poor enough that make that "dignity" stuff not worth achieving.
ReplyDelete