The love affair that newspapers have with public notices is symptomatic
of the sclerosis afflicting them.
On the one hand, newspaper executives crow about their
digital mastery and strategy.
On the other hand, they fight tooth and nail against the
abolition of public notices in print – a prime advertising source.
State law requires that public notices, such as bids and
requests for proposals issued by municipalities, be published in a newspaper.
In print. On paper. Newsprint, technically. Manufactured
from trees.
Not on the Internet, even though it’s 2013.
Even though other industries have adapted to the digital
world.
Think how much money municipalities could save if they were
legally permitted to publish legal notices on their web sites instead of paying
thousands of dollars to have them published in the local newspaper.
Here again is an example of the perverse personality
disorder of newspaper companies in general.
In the news department, reporters are encouraged to expose
waste and fraud
in local government.
To protect the public interest. Which includes how taxes are
spent and where they are spent.
They are encouraged to post continuous news electronically.
Down the corridor, the advertising geniuses huddle with the
bean counters and the top newspaper execs plotting against any legislation that
would demolish those lucrative dollars.
How would you feel if
someone told you that you could only shop at one grocery store or buy certain
foods?
Don’t you get the feeling newspapers are acting like a
cartel, telling municipalities – meaning you the taxpayers – they have to
advertise on their platform.
It’s almost un-American.
What happened to competition – which invariably leads to
lower prices, at least in the short run –
and a little free enterprise?
Every year, a municipality introduces a bill that would
permit localities to publish their legal notices on their taxpayer funded Web
sites.
And every year, the Virginia Press Association, the industry’s
lobbying group, opposes the bills and gets them killed.
Three bills have been filed to repeal the law – HB 1373, HB1378 and HB 1426 – for the 2013 General Assembly session.
Instead of re-tooling their imagination, re-inventing or
re-shaping the model, newspaper companies cling to antiquated practices
dictated by advertising amoebas.
Now the bills address legal notices published by
municipalities.
Soon, very soon, someone might suggest that foreclosure
notices, adoptions and divorces should be published on the Internet instead in
a newspaper.
But that’s another column.
I agree with you - for the most part. The thing I like about having public notices in the daily newspaper is that it makes them part of the public record. You won't have that if the notices are spread out across various local websites.... Plus, one can't help but appreciate the irony - in essence, cities are being required to fund the very thing which is holding them accountable. So of course they want to find an alternative. They want less accountability.
ReplyDelete