Presumably, the additional
revenue will finance the construction of four news schools – two in
predominantly black neighborhoods, Campostella and Broad Creek, and two in
predominantly white neighborhoods, Ocean View and Larchmont.
Yet the city only has $45
million in its coffer for new school construction.
So, raise taxes to
construct two additional schools.
According to city
estimates, each school will cost $20 million to $22 million. The costs are
based on the average cost of a school calculated by the state and not the
actual costs to construct the schools.
Presumably, City Council
is on the mayor’s side for the schools, the tax hike and a boost in certain
fees.
But the school board has
opposed the tax hike, apparently.
Enter construction magnate
Steve Ballard – again.
Last year he submitted a
proposal to the Norfolk school to build four new schools quicker and cheaper
than estimated by the city and the school board.
Ballard said he could
build four news schools in four years for $11 million less than if the city
“followed a traditional model of seeking designs, then asking for bids, and
then awarding a contract to a builder,” according to an editorial in the
Virginian-Pilot, dated August 5, 2012.
Ballard has considerable
clout in the region and his work is ubiquitous, from the construction of
elementary schools in Virginia Beach to such high-profile projects as Old
Dominion University’s Ted Constant Convocation Center and University Village.
Even his name has been
plastered to one of his projects – ODU SB Ballard Stadium at Foreman Field.
Yet the school board
spurned his proposal.
Now it’s 2013 and the
school construction issue is back on the table – not raising the educational
standards of Norfolk’s children, our future, and the city’s future.
These are the questions
that should be asked.
Or do we need quality
education even more so?
It is my understanding
that teachers are frustrated and upset with some schools whose ceilings leak
and with rooms ravaged by mold.
It is also my
understanding that two or more of the schools could be renovated using historic
tax credits.
Yet we are faced with a
tax hike as the only possible solution.
In the months preceding
the final vote by City Council of next year’s budget, beginning July 1, Mayor
Fraim suggested that the city manage the design and construction of new
schools.
Instead of submitting a
second proposal to the school board, Ballard submitted one to the city under
the auspices of the Public-Private Education and Infrastructure Act.
He sent the proposal to
the city with a cover letter, dated March 27.
But the proposal wasn’t
opened until April 3.
On April 9, Norfolk City
Council approved two ordinances that supposedly set the stage for Ballard’s
proposal.
Norfolk City Council
approved an ordinance “to adopt procedures for the selection, evaluation and
award of design-build and construction management contracts.”
City Council also approved
an amendment to the city’s code of the guidelines for proposals under
Virginia’s PPEA law.
No mention has been
made of the MGT of America study or the Citizens Task Force Report of Long
Range Facilities and the recommendations proposed in 2007 – the year City
Council reduced the tax rate $1.27 per $100 of assessed value to $1.11 per $100
of assessed value.
Stop pretending the tax hike is about schools. It's about expanding the spending power of the city. Period.
ReplyDeleteIf you don't believe me, then ask yourself why our mayor-in-chief is doubling the size of the suggested hike. Did the projected costs double? No. But political opportunism allowed for it. Citizens are silent over two cents, then why not double it to four? No justification needed.
We are still silent. Maybe he should double it again and make it eight cents. He probably could get away with. Evidently we stopped caring a long time ago.
The issue isn't the size of the tax increase. The issue is any tax increase when there is bureaucratic bloat. It's called rewarding bad behavior.
ReplyDelete